I support publication of draft-ietf-dnsop-integration-04 and have no objections.
I've read it closely — it's cited in our own draft-barrett-dnsop-domain-set, and we designed domain-set's DNS-discovery/HTTPS-manifest split specifically to satisfy the considerations this document lays out (lifecycle awareness, control validation, cross-TLD completeness). Having a clear, working-group-vetted reference for how applications should integrate domain names is useful well beyond our own draft, and I think it's ready to move forward. Thanks to the authors for the work. Tom Barrett EnCirca, Inc. On Mon, Aug 24, 2026 at 8:53 AM Ondřej Surý via Datatracker <[email protected]> wrote: > > This message starts a WG Last Call for: > draft-ietf-dnsop-integration-04 > > This Working Group Last Call ends on 2026-09-07 > > Abstract: > This document describes considerations when integrating a DNS domain > name into an application environment. Goals of this document include > minimizing conflicts between the global DNS and applications that > integrate with the global DNS, providing a consistent user experience > (unique identifier across environments), and avoiding impacts to the > security, stability, and resiliency of the global DNS. While all > sources of potential concern cannot be enumerated in one document, > accounting for at least the considerations discussed here should > improve the security posture of both the global DNS and integrating > applications. > > File can be retrieved from: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dnsop-integration-04.txt > > Please review and indicate your support or objection to proceed with the > publication of this document by replying to this email keeping [email protected] > in copy. Objections should be explained and suggestions to resolve them are > highly appreciated. > > Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual > Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [1]. > Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions > of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any. > Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can be > found at [3]. > > Thank you. > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/ > [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/ > [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/ > > The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-integration/ > > There is also an HTML version available at: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dnsop-integration-04.html > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-integration-04 > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] -- Schedule a call with me. https://calendar.app.google/BrESmtfgCG4tutSu7 Thomas Barrett President EnCirca, Inc +1.781.942.9975 (office) 400 W. Cummings Park, Suite 1725 Woburn, MA 01801 USA _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
