It appears that Ted Lemon <[email protected]> said: >This whole model is probably not ideal, but it's what we have. So in this >context, the fact that the protocol >label precedes a transport label does not mean that it therefore does not need >to be registered: just the >opposite. ...
Sorry, but that is exactly wrong. We had this discussion about SRV when we were setting up the underscored label registry and we agreed that the protocols do *not* go in the registry. If you don't believe me, look at what's in the registry now. In the SRV section you'll find 14 transports and no protocols. (If someone's going to say what about _http, look at RFC 4386 which is a little confused but uses http as a transport for PKI info.) R's, John _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
