> 
> Bill Manning writes:
> > the quarterly DNS audit trys to hit every delegation
> 
> But it fails to do so. You have an undisclosed number of AXFR rejections
> leading to an unknown number of servers. What you're surveying are DNS
> servers whose parents allow promiscuous AXFR---basically, whose parents
> are old, badly managed sites. You're missing a huge number of 3LDs.
> 
> My survey a year ago (http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/dns1.html) located 487828
> different IP addresses for 599366 DNS server names. This is far more
> than the 100581 found by your broken survey mechanism.
> 
> ---D. J. Bernstein, Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics,

        Your survey is published as a .COM survey.  The preliminary
        numbers I used was selected to most closely match 100,000
        servers from a variety of zones, most outside the US, making 
        percentage estimates painfully obvious. 

        I expect to have the full suite finished, including .COM
        early in the week...  We'll take the .COM data independently
        and, allowances for the disparity of a year, we should see
        some useful trends emerge.  

--bill 
        
.
dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html

Reply via email to