<hat=just-another-bozo-on-this-bus>

Pekka,

The short answer is that additional section processing should not
break up RRsets (nothing ever should, except for weird cases like the
RRSIG which doesn't really form proper RRsets at all).

Eg, assuming zone data:

foo.example.    IN      MX      1 foo.example.
                        MX      2 bar.example.
                        A       192.0.2.1
                        A       192.0.2.2
                        AAAA    2001:0db8::f00
bar.example.            A       192.0.2.3
                        AAAA    2001:0db8::baa
                        AAAA    2001:0db8::baaa

and a query <QNAME=foo.example., QTYPE=MX, QCLASS=IN>,

- you should get back 192.0.2.1 as additional data if and only if you
  also get back 192.0.2.2;

- you should get back 2001::0db8::baa as additional data if and only
  if you also get back 2001::0db8::baaa;

- but pretty much all the other possible combinations of addresses as
  additional data, while perhaps suboptimal, would be legal.

Does this answer your question?

</hat>
.
dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html

Reply via email to