On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, JINMEI Tatuya / [ISO-2022-JP] [EMAIL PROTECTED]@C#:H wrote: > At the Seoul meeting, the wg chairs asked if it makes sense to > merge draft-ietf-dnsop-misbehavior-against-aaaa-00.txt to > draft-ietf-dnsop-ipv6-dns-issues-04.txt or to keep them separate. > > As I responded there, I myself do not care about either way (my > co-author who was not there may have a different opinion). But I want > to be sure about the next step. In my understanding, there was not a > clear consensus on this at the meeting. Is this correct? And if so, > how can we make a decision?
Thanks for bringing this up -- it's pretty important to get to consensus on this. I was in the different meeting room around this so I don't know what triggered this discussion.. but IMHO it makes sense to keep these separate. It's better to have separate documents discuss separate issues, than trying to lump everything in one huge document. So, at least I would prefer to keep them separate.. if it counts for anything. Also note that their categories might be different: misbehaviour for Informational, ipv6-dns-issues for either BCP or Info (not sure which?) -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings . dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________ web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html
