>>>>> On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 18:57:21 +0300 (EEST),
>>>>> Pekka Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Sounds good, added. Thanks.
> I've also added note in the next paragraph noting that the prefix
> delegator, with case 1, may not actually provide any DDNS service but
> just insert a wildcard record, and refer to section 7.2:
(Just in case you're waiting for my response - and if so, sorry for
the delay) the added text works for me.
BTW,
> In the first case, managing the reverse DNS (delegation) is simpler
> as the DNS server and the prefix delegator are in the same
> administrative domain (as there is no need to delegate anything at
> all); alternatively, the prefix delegator might forgo DDNS reverse
> capability altogether, and use e.g., wildcard records (as described
> in Section 7.2). In the other cases, it can be slighly more
> difficult, particularly as the site will have to configure the DNS
> server to be authorative for the delegated reverse zone, implying
^^^^^^^^^^^this should be "authoritative"
though you may have already fixed the typo.
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html
