At Wed, 5 May 2004 07:57:01 +0300 (EEST), Pekka Savola wrote:
> ...
> So, let me ask the WG --
>
> 1) Should the problems (relavant to AAAA records) and QTYPE=* be
> covered in the document?
>
> 2) Should the problems of QTYPE=* be covered in a separate new
> document ("QTYPE=* Considered Unreliable" ? :) instead? Or if
> not, would an applicability statement be in order?
>
> 3) Should we more or less try to deprecate QTYPE=*, as it does not
> produce reliable results?
<hat co-chair=off just-another-bozo=on>
2) An applicability statement sounds like a good idea.
3) QTYPE=* itself should not be deprecated, but non-debugging use of
QTYPE=* probably should. See "applicability statement".
</hat>
.
dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html
