On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Alain Durand wrote: > On Apr 29, 2004, at 12:21 PM, Edward Lewis wrote: > > > Regarding the last call for: > >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dnsop-ipv6-dns-issues > >> -06.txt > > > > Section 1.3 > > > > Besides maintaining "at least one...IPv4", the section should also > > recommend making "at least one" available for IPv6 once v6 is > > available. I think that would even it out. > > Actually, the whole section 1.2 and 1.3 are a repeat of > draft-ietf-dnsop-ipv6-transport-guidelines-02 > that is now in the RFCeditor queue, so we might as well delete those > two sections and simply > point to the RFC to be.
It's still in IETF Last Call, so would probably change. Ed, can you suggest an appropriate change to the draft-ietf-dnsop-ipv6-transport-guidelines-02 and let's reflect that accordingly in draft-ietf-dnsop-ipv6-dns-issues-06.txt. (IMHO, it's still worth keeping in a summary of draft-ietf-dnsop-ipv6-transport-guidelines-02 in draft-ietf-dnsop-ipv6-dns-issues-06.txt, because let's be honest -- an average john doe isn't going to read it in any case :) -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings . dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________ web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html
