Hi Luc, First of all, thanks for your kind comments. During the last call of our draft, we'll reflect others' comments and suggestions on it, including yours. :-)
Paul ----- Original Message ----- From: "BELOEIL Luc FTRD/DMI/CAE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "IPv6 DNS Configuration" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2004 1:40 AM Subject: RE : [dnsop] Re: IPv6 Host Configuration of Recursive DNS Server > > This document is really interesting and is a good overview of solutions being > proposed. > > Anyway may I suggest some comments that may clarify or precise that good work ? > > Editorial suggestions : > > Page 3 - section 3.1 : "configura-tion" -> "configuration" > > Page 6 - section 3.2.1 : so as to facilitate comparison with section 3.1.1, could > you precise in advantage number 5 "such as NTP server address, SIP servers > addresses, ..." > > Page 7 - section 3.2.2 : is disadvantage number 1 a real one ? It seems the point > explains that it is currently an issue but that could not be if [10]... To my mind > if there any one solution proposal, there is no more disadvantage (RA and well-known > approaches are also draft proposal). > > Page 8 - Section 3.3 : last point deals with DNSSEC. It seems to me that RA and > DHCPv6 solution encounter the same issue. Thus I guess if that point should be > maintained here. > > Page 8 - section 4 : I feel ill-at-ease with the "last resort" point. I remember > that the point was already discussed but anyway it is till not clear. Should we > understand that the first option of anycast interworking approach means that such > anycast address MUST always be configured in any host ? (Note : ok this point is not > only editorial but also for my understanding) > > Page 9 - section 5 : the Note about guideline and enforcement may also be mentioned > in section 4, may not it ? > > Page 9-16 - sections 5.1 and 5.4 : it seems the same hierarchy as IETF v6ops wg > scenarios have been chosen. But I have the feeling that sections 5.1 and 5.4 > concentrate around the same issue "how to handle RDNSS information between PE and > CPE ?". Could section 5.1 be clarified and subdivised in : > - how to handle RDNSS information within ISP network > - how to exchange RDNSS information (if applicable) between PE and CPE > - how to handle RDNSS information in CPE > - how to handle RDNSS information in customer network (what may be a good > introduction to enterprise scenario, unmanaged scenario and home/SOHO subscribers > scenario) ? > > Page 10 - section 5.1.2 : please clarify "so that DHCPv6 can be may applied for the > current ..." ? > > Page 11 - section 5.1.4 : the points of the two last paragraphs are not clear, and > the first one is already described in section 5.1.2 > > Page 11 - section 5.2 : I do not think that any reference to UNIX should be > mentioned, or please define or propose a reference for the term "UNIX". > > Page 12 - section 5.2.1 : Sorry, I do no understand the point....especially it is > not clear if each level is configured through DHCPv6... and what configures what ? > Is that exist in any enterprise ? > > Page 15 - section 5.3.4 : I suggest to add "Note : history" before the second > paragraph. > > My 0.02 % > Luc > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Jaehoon Paul Jeong > Envoy� : lundi 7 juin 2004 05:57 > � : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc : DHC WG; V6OPS WG; IPv6 WG; IPv6 DNS Configuration > Objet : [dnsop] Re: IPv6 Host Configuration of Recursive DNS Server > > > Hi all, > > For 1 week, there have been no comments on our IPv6 DNS Configuraion. > > http://www.adhoc.6ants.net/~paul/publications/ietf-internet-draft/draft-ietf-dnsop-ipv6-dns-configuration-00.txt > > Does it mean that there is no problem about this draft and it is ok to request WGLC? > :-) > > Paul > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "IPv6 DNS Configuration" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 2:38 PM > Subject: Re: IPv6 Host Configuration of Recursive DNS Server > > > > There is some problem of column alignment at our draft. > > You can find a fixed version at the following site: > > http://www.adhoc.6ants.net/~paul/publications/ietf-internet-draft/draf > > t-ietf-dnsop-ipv6-dns-configuration-00.txt > > > > Thanks. > > > > Paul > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: "IPv6 DNS Configuration" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 10:10 AM > > Subject: IPv6 Host Configuration of Recursive DNS Server > > > > > > > Hello DNSOP members, > > > > > > As you know, a new draft has been published for IPv6 Host > > > Configuration of DNS Server Information Approaches: > > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dnsop-ipv6-dns-config > > > uration-00.txt > > > > > > For a long time, DNS Discovery has been discussed at both IPv6 and > > > DNSOP working groups. The long discussion seems to be resolved > > > through this draft. > > > > > > In this draft, three approaches are suggested: (a) RA option, (b) > > > DHCPv6 option, and > > > (c) Well-known anycast addresses for Recursive DNS Servers. > > > We, authors, used "DNS Configuration" instead of "DNS Discovery" because > > > recursive DNS server address is > > > only configured in IPv6 host, not generating DNS server address like in IPv6 > > > address autoconfiguration. > > > > > > This draft focuses on describing the attributes of three approaches > > > and suggesting four applicable scenarios: > > > (a) ISP network, (b) Enterprise network, (c) 3GPP network, (d) Unmanaged network. > > > > > > Through your review and comments, this will be published as > > > Informational RFC according to our milestones. IMHO, if necessary, > > > the drafts of two other approaches except DHCPv6 option will be > > > developed into separate RFCs. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Paul, > > > IPv6 DNS Configuration Design Team. > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > > Jaehoon Paul Jeong (Research Engineer) > > > TEL. +82-42-860-1664 > > > Mobile +82-16-711-1765 > > > 161 Gajeong-dong Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-350, Korea > > > NGI Standardization Research Team/PEC/ETRI > > > Homepage: http://www.adhoc.6ants.net/~paul > > > > > > > . > dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________ > web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html > mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html > > . > dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________ > web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html > mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html > . dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________ web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html
