Hello, I'm sending this to you as the shepherding AD of draft-ietf-dnsop-misbehavior-against-aaaa-01.txt.
According to the I-D tracker page, https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=11591&rfc_flag=0 the status draft is "AD Followup" where "the shepherding AD has the action item to determine appropriate next steps". So, I've been waiting for a suggestion on the next steps. However, Pekka Savola suggested me to revise the draft spontaneously, addressing the comments shown in the tracker page. (according to him) the new revision would help/accelerate the decision of the next steps for the shepherding AD. Basically, I'm willing to do that (at least revising the draft in the IESG evaluation doesn't harm much...), but if I heavily misunderstand the process and should rather wait for the suggested next steps, please let me know. Thanks, JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED] . dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________ web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html
