Hi all, What do others think about Ohta-san's suggestion below?
I prefer the prevous text for 3GPP because we, at least me, intended to show the applicability scenarios of IPv6 DNS Configuration in four important kinds of networks as like transition scenarios of V6OPS WG. As 3GPP is an important network for IPv6 deployment, it is better to keep the position of the text for 3GPP. IMHO, RA issue at WLAN is just informational at our draft and the appendix for it will be a good seed for further discussion on it. Remember that this draft is for IPv6 DNS Configuration, not for ND at WLAN. This should be handled at another stuff. Thanks. Paul ----- Original Message ----- From: "Masataka Ohta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > If this is agreed, I will submit the new version (-04) reflecting > > Pekka's comments about RA's. > > As I said, remove (or move to appedix) 3GPP section, then. > > Masataka Ohta > > > . > dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________ > web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html > mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html > > . dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________ web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html
