Hi, Regarding the raising of draft-ietf-dnsop-dontpublish-unreachable-03, it was asked where ureachables might be placed in the DNS, I think one area where this was suggested as possible was by some people in the IPv6 WG where the new "guaranteed" unique ULAs may be published since (in theory) there is no ambiguity with the ULAs.
I agree with Alain that this still seems undesirable. The 03 version talks about deprecated IPv6 items, such as site-locals and IPv4 compatibles. (Also I see no 04 version at watersrings: http://www.watersprings.org/pub/id/draft-ietf-dnsop-dontpublish-unreachable-03.txt, is there an 04 that they didn't pick up since Feb'02?) -- Tim . dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________ web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html
