At 10:12 -0500 11/15/04, Miek Gieben wrote:
So I went for DNSKEY and Ed goes for DS. Two people, two different choices. I think we should let the implementers decide this and not the draft writers,
Well, it's deeper than that. We've implemented the DS option and not the DNSKEY option in our initial toolkit. You've implemented the DNSKEY option.
The question is - if you had to do it all over again, would you have bothered with the DNSKEY option? Has there been any demand to use the DNSKEY option by any users/testers of SECREG?
This isn't intended as a critical question, nor just a question over what is said in the draft. I'm trying to determine if there is a reason for the DNSKEY option.
-- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis +1-571-434-5468 NeuStar
I would have been at the meeting, but I was busy raking the leaves from the (now) empty non-terminals in my yard. . dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________ web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html
