I support this draft going forward. I know there isn't enough "real world" experience with DNSSEC to have a final say about best common practices, but it is a good guide.
Scott > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rob Austein > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 3:41 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [dnsop] WGLC on > draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-operational-practices-03 > > > This is a working group last call on the "DNSSEC Operational > Practices" draft, draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-operational-practices-03, > which we hope to submit to the IESG for consideration as a BCP > document. > > This last call will terminate at 21:00 UTC on 9 March 2005. > > Please clearly state to the mailing list whether you support or oppose > this draft going to the IESG. > > Please do not express an opinion if you have not read the draft. > > As always, please discuss substantive issues on the WG mailing list. > Minor editorial comments may be sent directly to the draft authors > (please CC the WG chairs on any such comments so that we can track > this). > > Thanks, > > Rob & Dave > . > dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________ > web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html > mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html > . dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________ web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html
