On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 02:44:35PM -0800, David Meyer wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 01:21:35PM -0800, David Meyer wrote: >> >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 04:10:23PM -0500, Dean Anderson wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, David Meyer wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > draft-ietf-dnsop-inaddr-required-06: enough people seem to >> >> >> > care to make it worthwhile to push this forward >> >> >> > in the present direction >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> Can we get a list of names of people who care enough about this draft >> >> >> to >> >> >> move it forward? >> >> >> >> >> >> I'm not the only person to have noted that there has been little >> >> >> discussion of this draft in several years. Excluding comments >> >> >> against it, there has been almost NO discussion whatsoever in several >> >> >> years. >> >> >> >> >> >> The last thread titled"IN-ADDR Draft", wasn't about the draft either, >> >> >> as >> >> >> noted by several, including Senie. >> >> >> >> >> >> I'd like to see a more detailed transcript of the WG meeting. What >> >> >> transpired during the 8 minutes allocated to this draft to make anyone >> >> >> think that there is interest in this draft? What was said to make >> >> >> people >> >> >> believe that it contains correct information? >> >> >> >> I've asked Joel where the mp3s from the meetings are (I >> >> don't think he's put them up yet; in any event they are >> >> likely the most detailed transcript available). As soon >> >> as I get that information, I'll pass it on. >> >> >> >> mp3s: http://limestone.uoregon.edu/ftp/pub/videolab/video/ietf62 >> channel2room: http://videolab/events/ietf/
Make that:
channel2room: http://videolab.uoregon.edu/events/ietf
Dave
pgp0xrFE1yM3U.pgp
Description: PGP signature
