Bruce Campbell wrote: > ( Yes yes, other aspects of DNS can still be used as amplifiers, but > theres no point us making it too easy. )
the amplification is not larger than with a standard DNS query, even without DNSSEC. > > I'd like to have an agreed upon debugging aid *soon*. > > urm... I'll agree with Paul in (ab)using EDNS0 for client/server ID, > because its slightly more elegant than magic-string in the query section, Just to clarify: i do not believe a TLD in any class gives sooner results than an EDNS0 option, so we agree here. > ( I don't think publishing-as-RFC a document that says 'something with > these properties would be cool, but we don't have that yet' is a good > idea. ) You want the word 'requirements' in the title? -Peter . dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________ web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html
