Also see thread starting at:
http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/msg03465.html
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >>> # o "Maximum/Minimum Zone TTL"
> >> # The maximum or minimum value of the TTLs from the complete set
> >> # of RRs in a zone.
> >>
> >> This has nothing to do with the last number in the SOA RR, right? Right?
> >>
> >
> >Correct you take all the TTL values in the zone and take the minimum
> >and the maximum of that set. Is the text that is there now ambiguous?
>
> The problem is this text from 1035:
>
> #RFC 1035 Domain Implementation and Specification November 1987
> #
> #MINIMUM The unsigned 32 bit minimum TTL field that should be
> # exported with any RR from this zone.
>
> Maybe you should make an explicit reference that the Minimum Zone TTL
> may be less that the MINIMUM field in the SOA RR.
>
Proposed text:
o "Maximum/Minimum Zone TTL"
The maximum or minimum value of the TTLs from the complete set
of RRs in a zone. Note that the minumum TTL is not the same as the
MINIMUL field in the SOA RR.
-- Olaf
---------------------------------| Olaf M. Kolkman
---------------------------------| RIPE NCC
---------------------------------| JID: olaf at jabber.secret-wg.org
.
dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html
