Peter,
I went back to have a look at the list of drafts, and as I was
reparsing your message was a bit confused by the following passage in
your proposal (which BTW is a good initiative):
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> The dnsop wg will consider new work items if at least N individuals
> commit to review documents before WG Last Call (including
> revisions).
> ...
OK, I get this part.
> No new work items will be accepted until before the IETF65 -00
> cutoff.
Huh?
"until before the IETF65 cutoff"???
We are at "before cutoff" _now_, and we've been so for all of my
life and then some. :-)
This must be a typo. What did you actually mean to say? :-)
"until after"?
"until 2 weeks before"?
Cheers,
/Liman
.
dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html
