On 4-Jul-2006, at 04:01, Pekka Savola wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Title : Locally-served Zones
Author(s) : M. Andrews
Filename : draft-ietf-dnsop-default-local-zones-00.txt
Pages : 10
Date : 2006-6-20
As I said before, the draft includes section on RFC 3330 zones
(such as the broadcast and loopback), but it not in sync with RFC
3330 and/or does not justify the reason. Most importantly, it's not
clear why 255.255.255.255.IN-ADDR.ARPA is there instead of the
whole 255/8 or even 240/4.
It is debatable whether any of the others (e.g., 198.18.0.0/15)
should be on that list.
Once those questions have been answered, it seems possible that
there's some useful crossover between the conclusions reached and
AS112 ops.
There's no current formal mechanism for the IN-ADDR.ARPA zones
corresponding to private-use or reserved netblocks to be delegated to
AS112 servers by the IANA. Perhaps there should be.
Joe
.
dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html
