David Conrad writes: > > On Aug 20, 2014, at 6:36 AM, Marco Davids (SIDN) <[email protected]> = > wrote: > > Speaking of client-side validation, Bloodhound might also proof to be > > worthwhile. I like it: > > https://www.dnssec-tools.org/wiki/index.php/Bloodhound > > Briefly looking at the source for libval (which Bloodhound uses), it = > does not appear 5011 is supported (unsurprisingly). Anyone know if there = > are any validator libraries that do support 5011? Or perhaps more = > realistically, has anyone come up with a daemon that updates =93the = > trust anchor=94 (in the various configuration files in which it might be = > found) in the event of a root KSK roll? >
You mean, something like autotrust? <http://nlnetlabs.nl/projects/autotrust/> jaap
