*** Democracies Online Newswire - http://dowire.org *** *** Headlines from top blogs: http://dowire.org/feeds ***
Last week I passed on my extensive outline below to the Do-Consult e-mail list. One reply shared a project you will want to check out: http://caae.phil.cmu.edu/picola/ http://caae.phil.cmu.edu/picola/preview.html - Flash Tour http://communityconnections.heinz.cmu.edu/picola - More My note and outline ... In perhaps five, ten or twenty years, I cannot image most official representative processes without "any time, anywhere" aspects of formal and informal citizen participation. Inserting online participation into representative democracy in a way that adds value and not just more noise or time consumption is the critical challenge. While I am very supportive of special online- only consultations, in the end, I'd like to see a full integration of in-person and online forms of participation within the framework of representative democracy. I don't see democracy surviving in any real way if effective citizen participation essentially mandates specific time and place participation. I believe people need real choices. Systems must accommodate input over a few days or weeks and not just specific hours. If democracy didn't exist and you were going to build it today, how would you build it differently or more conveniently? Attached is a rough outline of the technical project requirements for an Online Committee Room. What do you think? E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Steven Clift http://www.publicus.net Online Committee Room Draft 0.6 - Steven Clift, Copyright 2004 Friday, September 17, 2004 Draft System Requirements Outline Goals of system - Preserve and enhance the democratic relevancy and deliberation within the legislative committee process - High value, quality input - Ability to accommodate quantity without unorganized information overload - Quality exchange of questions - use the system to help ask the right policy questions - Member questions, ideas and opinions documented - Public input received in multiple forms and displayed online - allowing interest group accountability and greater understanding of the complexity of policy choices and political interests - Promote additional public testimony on the "any time, anywhere" basis that citizens expect in the information age - Encourage citizen understanding and participation in the legislative process Pre-Meeting Items that may be places online within content management system - Agendas - Bill links, Option for members to share draft/working amendments if desired - Speakers List and Contact Details - TV, Webcast Schedule Notes and Links - Related Links to agenda items - Pre-submitted Testimony Text, Handouts, Presentations (released when speaking or earlier at the option of person testifying) - will require web-based uploading facility and optional login accounts for those testifying - Pre-Submitted Member remarks, questions or other materials/links - Legislative research documents During Meeting - Real-time webcast -- Audio-only option -- Video with subtitle capabilities -- Option for contextual links around video window to agenda items, documents etc. as they become relevant - content context links added for view within archive version as well - Ability to share presentation slides with remote audience - Real-time release for testimony, handouts, etc. -- In-committee uploading and release (with anti-virus/format checking built in) - a computer somewhere in the room that accepts documents on disk, usb flash drive, cd-rom - document formatting guidelines recommended - file format, size, etc. for accessibility -- Committees have the option of requiring digitally shared testimony before hearings to allow real-time release - must have policy on whether prior review is allowed by anyone/give those testifying the right to control when documents are available - when submitted, when hearing starts, when they speak during hearing - Real-time release of member amendments, prepared remarks - Vote displays - Committee attendance display - Optional real-time chat space for audience interaction (similar to hallway space, note passing) - Optional - assuming limited wi-fi network, audience members in person and off-site could publicly make their presence known at their option and engage the system and each other if logged in - Option for representatives to receive digital notes from public web form/e-mail/instant messaging Chair's view: -- Testimony sign-up "sheet" -- Timer/clock, time allotment -- Members question queue Member view: - (optional lock) - To prevent member use of laptop/web browser for non-meeting business during committee meetings (noting that in MN you can use laptops in the main Chamber but not committee meetings because there you are really supposed to pay attention - need to preserve discretion of the Chair to ensure member focus and decorum) Audience view - WiFi access in building/rooms option - a democratic right compared to paid services or GPRS and other data services afforded by certain lobbyists - Need noise/sound/key stroke policies/white noise Public Remote Access/Participation - Public login with real identity optionally promote, required or disabled where appropriate - must ensure values of decorum and respect required of the legislative institution as compare to often anonymous political discussion forums with less civil exchange - View all real-time content - Ability to "annotate" or add comments to the testimony of others - option that may be turned on or off - Remote testimony - standard video conferencing, Internet-based video conferencing - perhaps applet based using open standards? -- Submit textual testimony/additional documents, real-time or for X amount of time after the close of the real-time meeting -- Audio testimony - via Internet or telephone with special access code to convert and place audio in proper place - Citizen question queue - for members eyes/public option - used at member discretion Post-Meeting - XX Hours/Days for Extended Public Comment and Submissions - XX Hours/Days for "linear" (one after another) comments on testimony, comments on comments - Member Questions - Ability for representatives to post unanswered policy questions - to those who testifies, the public, others (create an opportunity for value-added input) - Real Names - Allow committee/system to require registration with identity verification to open full account and service -- Allow requirement to be turned off as a whole, for particular hearings where unregistered or anonymous participation is desirable or needed --- ability to time-delay, review/remove inappropriate posts as well as the ability to limit use of that feature by event (guidelines and procedures will be required to keep within the law/freedom of expression - must make clear what the equivalent of disorderly public conduct online is in real practice online - will be extremely rare just as it is with the physical removal or arrest of protester at in- person government hearings) - Full archive access for all materials Committee Summary Module - analysis and time saver - # of x,y,z statistics - 50 word/500 character self "summary" field built in throughout - aggregated summary view - More/external links gathered - Committee member recommended links - Ability to use content analysis tools/plug-ins (likely a commercial product) Image Gallery - Ability to upload digital photos if taken - Or grab webcast photos via connected computer or television cameras - upload standard "testimony" image for each testifier each year - ability to show photo while speaking with audio-only feed, or show on web site Committee Pack and Go - Convert all/selected documents into PDF format optimized for printing/paper saving - (convert XML into standard published format) Policy Survey Module - Ability to ask multiple choice and open-ended questions of those testifying, the interested public, the "general" public or e-citizen survey panel - Output views built-in - use for information gathering not plebiscites or hot button issues with leading questions - survey to gather input/stories/resources - Note Queensland and Issy, France examples Online Hearing Module Ability to use the system without an actual in-person committee meeting - Set date range ... One, two, three weeks, etc. - Establish structured "agenda" - not a "free for all" web forum for example - Allow initial asynchronous testimony by select expert, panelists, "signed up" members of the interested public - Support Q and A from legislators to those testifying - Allow public commentary through out or during select times as determined by the Chair - Upload audio, video, testimony text (require such text to be submitted via forms with limited formatting - no formatted Word or PDF documents), additional documents in various formats (Word, PDF, HTML, PPT, etc..) - Registration system, make use of "real name" or anonymous participation an option of the Chair Citizen Panel Module Two options: - An invite-only system for outreach to targeted groups where enhanced input is desired (clients of a specific government program, etc.) OR a "citizen jury" like approach where a sample of citizens are invited to participate - Open System - Where targeted outreach is coupled with "those who show up" - particularly in a pre-committee hearing phase - Offer input to meeting agendas for example???? Reports to Legislature Review Module - Summary text collected/submitted uniformly - Summary presentation submission from agency - slides, audio, video, etc. with time/word limits - Full digital - multi-format access (useful for archival/historical purposes as well) Real-Time Module - Complement IP-based video conferencing abilities - Moderated HTML Interview Q and A (Washington Post, US House) - Moderated chat-based interview system with transcripts Draft Notes - This is an early draft. It is designed as a discussion point and is not part of any formal project. - Creation of full system requirements would assist those with any content management system (proprietary, open source, etc.) build a state of the art system within their current technical foundation - Ideally, a funding organization would help E-Democracy.Org and a consortium of other interested organizations build this system as a module(s) contributed to a widely used open source content management system(s) with momentum. - The key outcome of this system would be to allow the citizens - any of us - to viably participate in representative process on our own time, from anywhere. - The "Online Committee Room" could be used at all levels of government and might be extremely useful for full local government council meetings, meetings of government appointed task forces and commissions, and not just committee meetings. ^ ^ ^ ^ Steven L. Clift - - - W: http://publicus.net Minneapolis - - - - E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Minnesota - - - - - - T: +1.612.822.8667 USA - - - - - MSN/Y!/AIM: netclift Join my Democracies Online Newswire: http://dowire.org EDem's Election 2004 Links: http://e-democracy.org/us *** Past Messages, to Subscribe: http://dowire.org *** *** To subscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** Message body: SUB DO-WIRE *** *** To UNSUBSCRIBE instead, write: UNSUB DO-WIRE *** *** Please send submissions to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** New RSS XML Feed Available: *** http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/maillist.xml
