*** Democracies Online Newswire -  http://www.e-democracy.org/do ***
* Future of E-Democracy - http://publicus.net/articles/future.html *

The report's <http://www.congressonlineproject.org/webstudy2002.html>
table of contents and a few clips are below.


The folks at <http://www.gop.gov/item-news.asp?N=20020128084904> were
celebrating before the report's release.  They were already linked to
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A46591-2002Jan27> which has
a story on the report.  I met with the GOP.Gov folks in late 2000.  I
was impressed.

In the U.S. Congress it seems clear that political competition will
be the main motivation for advancing the online services members
provide to the public and not the creation of a more uniform "online
constituent office" that all members would/could use.  This will
result in a selection of ever improving elite sites and lots of
members with inferior sites and little incentive to improve.  GOP.gov
however points to party-based aggregation of technical services which
may bring the overall offerings of member to higher level and provide
the party caucus structure a more powerful online command and control
operation with external communication.

The party-based development contrasts with trends in the Minnesota
legislature where the House members directory is evolving into a
uniform set of online offerings regardless of party
<http://ww3.house.leg.state.mn.us/members/housemembers.asp>. (And I
just noticed that all MN House members now have e-mail update
subscription options for the public, just click in a bit - this is a
big deal!).  Although, with our budget shortfall, we are seeing a
number of party-based issue sites <http://www.mnbalancedbudget.com>
emerge this session.

Steven Clift
Democracies Online
http://www.e-democracy.org/do

P.S. I just updated my "secret" http://politicalbs.com site to
include quick access to more popular US Congressional content that
changes frequently.  By tracking click-outs in aggregate I am trying
to learn what political information and news is most popular.


From:
http://www.congressonlineproject.org/webstudy2002.html

Congress Online
Assessing and Improving Capitol Hill Web Sites

HTML by Section:
http://www.congressonlineproject.org/webstudy2002.html
Printable PDF Version (514 KB)
http://www.congressonlineproject.org/congressonline2002.pdf
Executive Brief (90 KB)
http://www.congressonlineproject.org/executive2002.pdf


About This Report

The goal of the Congress Online Project is to provide congressional
offices guidance to improve the online communications between Members
of Congress and the public they serve. This report is the heart of
this effort. The purpose of this report is to assist congressional
offices in developing effective Web sites. To achieve this end, we
discuss the five building blocks that are most critical to building
effective Web sites. We then identify and award the specific
congressional Web sites that are currently applying these building
blocks most effectively - the Congress Online Gold and Silver Mouse
Award winners. We hope that by identifying the best Web sites on
Capitol Hill and delineating the practices that make them the best,
this report will motivate many more offices to improve their Web-
based communications.

Summary of Key Findings
Introduction
Methodology
Nine Benefits of a Good Web Site
The Five Building Blocks of Effective Congressional Web Sites
    1. Audience
    2. Content
    3. Interactivity
    4. Usability
    5. Innovations
Assessing the Performance of Congressional Web Sites
    Analyzing Grade Distribution Trends
    Analyzing Trends in Award Winners
    The Best Web Sites on Capitol Hill
Congress Online Gold Mouse Awards
    Senate Member Offices
    House Member Offices
    Standing Committees
    Leadership Offices
Congress Online Silver Mouse Awards
    Audience
    Content
    Interactivity
    Usability
    Innovations
Mistakes Congressional Offices are Making
Change Factors Between 1999 - 2001
Conclusion


Appendix A: Research & Findings
    Constituent Focus Groups
    Interviews with Congressional Staff
    Industry Research
    Survey of Political Reporters
    Survey of Advocacy Groups
    Reviews of Non-congressional Web Sites
    Review of Previous Analysis of Congressional Web Sites
Appendix B: Evaluation Methodology
Appendix C: Congress Online Project Expert Panel Biographies
Acknowledgments
About the Congress Online Project

From:
http://www.congressonlineproject.org/gold2002.html

Congress Online Gold Mouse Awards

Senate Member Offices

Senator Jeff Bingaman (D-NM)
Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA)
Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX)
Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT)


House Member Offices

Rep. Kay Granger (R-TX)
Rep. Mike Honda (D-CA)
Rep. Mike Pence (R-IN)
Rep. Richard Pombo (R-CA)


Standing Committees

Senate Budget Committee (majority)
House Committee on Energy and Commerce (majority)
House Committee on Energy and Commerce (minority)
House Committee on Rules (majority)


Leadership Offices

Speaker of the House
Office of the House Majority Whip
House Republican Conference

From:
http://www.congressonlineproject.org/silver2002.html

Congress Online Silver Mouse Awards


Audience

Senator Fred Thompson (R-TN)
Representative Nick Smith (R-MI)
Joint Economic Committee
House Committee on Resources (majority)
House Committee on Small Business (majority)
House Democratic Caucus


Content

Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)
Senator Carl Levin (D-MI)
Representative Tom Allen (D-ME)
Representative Chris Cannon (R-UT)
House Committee on the Budget (majority)
House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct


Interactivity

Senator Mary Landrieu (D-LA)
Representative Brad Carson (D-OK)


Usability

Senator Don Nickles (R-OK)
Representative Mark Green (R-WI)
Representative John Thune (R-SD)


Innovations

Senator Bob Graham (D-FL)
Representative Heather Wilson (R-NM)
House Science Committee (majority)





^               ^               ^                ^
Steven L. Clift    -    W: http://www.publicus.net
Minneapolis    -   -   -     E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Minnesota  -   -   -   -   -    T: +1.612.822.8667
USA    -   -   -   -   -   -   -     ICQ: 13789183

*** Please send submissions to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]     ***
*** To subscribe, e-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]          ***
***         Message body:  SUB DO-WIRE                  ***
*** To unsubscribe instead, write: UNSUB DO-WIRE        ***

*** Please forward this post to others and encourage    ***
*** them to subscribe to the free DO-WIRE service.      ***


Reply via email to