Hi Torsten! --- Torsten Schlabach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you for your explainations. I appreciate your > patience
I try to respect people, especially when they are serious and they deserve it. > and I > really think DocbookWiki keeps improving every day. Either you are not honest (sorry, this is what I think), or you are wrong. It is not improving everyday. People have also everyday problems to think about, and are not always quiet enough to think about science and similar things. > Sorry for this email being out of the thread, > SourceForge had some > problems obviously. I only read your answer on > www.mail-archive.com and > I cannot get the header needed to keep the thread > together from there. > > Anyway: > > > 1 - After importing a new book you should also > > add an entry for it in > > 'content/SVN/book_list.sh' > > You mean: Alter the script? Sure, why not. > > > (maybe this should be done automatically by > > the system, I am not sure about it) > > I think this is what most users would expect. Don't > you think so? I was > calling that script and wondering why my new books > don't show up there, > neither the imported nor the newly created ones. Sorry, but my aim was never to satisfy everybody or most of the people. I think that it is better (it is right) to do it manually. I think that most of the people are lost (are in a wrong path) so I don't think that I have to fulfill everybody's expectations. > Regarding documentation: I would personally suggest > that you should > either try to make everything work through the web > interface (which > would be most desireable) *or* make it very clear > that some operations > require using the command line. I think that it *is* already clear that the web interface is secondary and it is not a substitute for the command line. But in case it is not so clear and the people have to find out about it, I think that this is still ok. > I would have contributed to the manual, but the site > was down, > unfortunately. You can modify a local copy of the manual and send me the patches. > > Creating a separate repository for each document > > is a design decision. If you think that it could > > have been done better, we can disscuss the > advantages > > and dissadvantages of it at: > > I am not saying it's bad. I was just confused, > because what you > explained in your mail was not obvious to me. It > might still be > discussed if this is a good decision or not, but > first things first. I > think this is not the most imporant part to work on. > > Regards, > Torsten > > P.S.: I might have asked this before, but it might > have gotten lost in > SF list troubles: Which one is to be used to stay on > top of the latest > code changes? The SF *CVS* repository or the SF > *SVN* repository or are > they synced? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Doc-book-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doc-book-users
