Hi Dashamir, > About the suggestion, maybe it is better to keep > --code unmodified and to introduce another tag, > e.g. --code-- which would wrap the content in > CDATA. What do you think?
I just had a look at "DocBook: The Definitive Guide" and you're probably right. There should not be an automatism to have a programlisting wrapped into a CDATA tag in any case because the docbook standard does allow for markup inside a program listing, which can be useful. But then, why not keep it simple and introduce --cdata ---- so it would be --code --cdata your program listing here ---- ---- That would also allow for something like: --code --cdata some not so important code in the beginning ---- <emphasis> --cdata more code ---- </emphasis> ---- Or would nested blocks cause a problem for the current version of the parser? WDYT? Regards, Torsten -------- Original-Nachricht -------- Datum: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 03:43:04 -0700 (PDT) Von: Dashamir Hoxha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: "Helping the users of DocBookWiki to install and use it." <[email protected]> Betreff: Re: [doc-book-users] Editing Code fragments (CDATA sections should not be touched) > --- Torsten Schlabach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My suggestion would be: > > > > - Automatically wrap the code in between --code and > > ---- in a CDATA. > > - Look at the escape logic. > > > > I am happy to do that and submit a patch if > > > > a) anyone (Dashamir?) agrees this is the way > > b) someone might give me a hint what pieces of code > > I would have to look at. > > > > In other words: Where's the Text (Wiki) processor? > > Torsten, > > I am going to try and fix them, however you are > welcome to have a look at it, in any case (for > example you may come up with other suggestions > about them). > > The editing code is in the directory: > templates/docbook/edit/content > > and the Text (Wiki) processor is in: > templates/docbook/edit/content/text_to_xml > > About the suggestion, maybe it is better to keep > --code unmodified and to introduce another tag, > e.g. --code-- which would wrap the content in > CDATA. What do you think? > > About the escape logic, it something that > definitly needs to be fixed, I have noticed it > as well. > > Regards, > Dashamir > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share > your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Doc-book-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doc-book-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Doc-book-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doc-book-users
