2008/9/24 A.M. Kuchling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 07:10:59PM -0400, Fred Drake wrote:
>
> I think nesting the optional arguments doesn't actually indicate
> whether keywords are supported or not. For example,
> two functions from the socket module are:
>
> .. function:: getaddrinfo(host, port[, family[, socktype[, proto[, flags]]]])
> .. method:: socket.recv_into(buffer[, nbytes[, flags]])
>
> getaddrinfo() doesn't support keyword arguments; recv_into() does.
> But nesting the brackets does add a lot of typographical fluff.
>
> Can we invent a new notation for separating which functions support
> keywords and which don't? How would we render that distinction
> typographically in the output?
>
I would like to suggest an idea which wouldn't involve typographical
changes. I think keyword arguments could be represented just if they
were in a dictionary, something like: buffer, **{nbytes, flags}
Maybe it would take some time for the people to get used to the new
syntax, but I think is it, at least, similar to Python code.
_______________________________________________
Doc-SIG maillist - Doc-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/doc-sig
