Salam all, I want to make some advocacy for my point of view in some very short points:
+ I do not think masdar is better then fi3l amr gramatically or that, that form is "righter". My only view is the ease for the user. +masdar is very elegant as way TOO many dialogs are going from the PC to the user asking him to do things, YES you are reading right from the PC TO THE USER, making a fi3l amr for that and a fi3l amr for the normal actions will irritate the user. +I don't want to irritate the users out there who will not have a light transition to linux, they will think linux is irritating and will stop and maybe return to windows, so why detriorating 99% of our userbase only for what "can be true"? as said Elzubairs view can be true I was never against it. +I said this again and again, but pls think yourself what is better? a neutral interface or a chaotic interface? "iftah" and then the pc comes with a dialog "idkhil 3unwan albruksi" what will the first time user think?!!! +I am using arabic gnome 2.6 right now and I went through all the files I think that's the SAFEST way to go maybe not the best but the safest, when gnome 2.6 comes out pls give it a try. And look for yourself! yours Arafat _______________________________________________ Doc mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/doc
