======= At 2007-03-03, 19:54:04 you wrote: ======= >On Saturday 03 March 2007 17:36, Anas R. wrote: >> I don't think that FDL is good for dictionaries... it seems like we need >> sort of FDL+LGPL licence. >> >> Best regards, >> >> - Anas R. > > FDL+LGPL = ?
Dictionary is a 'printable library' >Licensing a dictionary seems strange. Should I license my document that I used >the Wordlist to write it to GPL? No, but I mean dictionary could be used as a library for other Software Applications, i.e: Can Microsoft, or any commercial software provider ship Arabeyes's dictionary (as a database) in its commercial products?, In its Office suite for example? >In the same time, can I translate a new >wordlist using Arabeyes' Wordlist and license it to X-PL? Can I >copyright "Green=أخضر"? Well, there was a discussion about copyrighting dictionaries in GNU mailing list, here's a brief summary: http://www.linuxfuture.org/archives/2007/02/entry_32.html - Anas R.
_______________________________________________ Doc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/doc
