At 23:30 17/09/2001 +0200, Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote:
>He insists on the future orientation of XSLT to let the users feel how
>the standard will evolve, and to avoid that XSLT implementors make the
>wrong choices, e.g. concerning the data types involved in processing a
>stylesheet.
But you don't *have* to use the 1.1 extensions surely?
> > Concerning my own ability at implementing a correct XSLT processor,
> > well you may not trust me, others do.
>
>You may admit that libxslt / libxml has just reached stability. Before
>(a few monthes ago), it was not so, xsltproc crashed a lot (sorry for
>not having reported the bugs BTW). Indeed you did a _very_ nice job.
>And xsltproc is FAST!!! (I saw faster processing however using tools
>like XSLT -> Java converters: once compiled, it is much faster than
>anything else, even xsltproc ;)
And considering that its only ??? months since Daniel announced, that's
not a bad record is it? Until we get the OASIS compliance testing, I guess
its still down to faith which is 'best for you', i.e. its a personal thing.
<grin>I also like the fervour with which he supports the product</grin>
Its like M$ supporting their biggest revenue earner!
Regards DaveP
----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
