Gerrit Kuilder wrote:

> Saxon seems faster indeed, now I need to find some ways to optimize my java 
>performance, It
> takes about 10 seconds before the transformation takes place. I have heard rumors 
>that java
> can be pre-loaded into memory and that I can reserve some more memory for the 
>transormation
> to take place (-Xmx512?)

If a performance is problem for you, can try xsltproc XSLT processor. It
is written in pure C (no Java overhead) and it is faster than Saxon.

                        Jirka

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
  Jirka Kosek                        
  e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://www.kosek.cz

----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>

Reply via email to