Robert: That is interesting indeed. I made the statement because I had to compile the files required to run XSLTproc. There are a lot of things that I have to learn, as I am the primary writer in my group, I don't have the interchange problems that you had, but can see why XSLTproc is a better alternative.
Carlos On 01/07/02 5:57, "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > === > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Carlos Araya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 12:54 AM > Subject: Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Newbie-esue question > > >> Daniel: >> >> I chuck that mistake to replying to a message without thinking. Any >> conformant XSL processor will work as Bob indicated on his message. > When I >> started working with XSLT I did find Java processors to be easier to > set up >> for my own use. That was before XSLTproc was available. >> >> FWIW, I now use XSLT proc, but I'm not sure that's the easiest > processor to >> set up for a newbie. >> >> My apologies for being java-centric > > Interestingly enough, I found the reverse to be true. On Windows all the > java programs require windows paths, which made sharing a config with > Unix a PITA. The lovely thing about xsltproc was that it ported fairly > easily to cygwin, letting me take a single makefile for documentation to > any machine. > > Rob > -- Carlos E. Araya ---+ WebCT Administrator/Trainer P | California Virtual Campus - | C/O De Anza College G | 21250 Stevens Creek Blvd ---+ Cupertino, CA 95014 email [EMAIL PROTECTED] web http://www.cvc1.org/ (work) http://www.silverwolf-net.net (personal) phone 408 257 0420 (work) PGP Fingerprint: E629 5DFD 7EAE 4995 E9D7 3D2F 5A9F 0CE7 DFE7 1756 Paradoxically, a refusal to 'put a monetary value on life' means that life is often undervalued. -- Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach
