On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 11:48:54PM +0100, Norman Walsh wrote: > / Alex Lancaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > | that extension. Any word (Daniel V.?) on whether that is planned or > | even possible at some stage in xsltproc? It's not part of the exsl > > Daniel and I have talked about getting the extensions ported over. > He's got some support for extensions in Python so as soon as a couple > of things are worked out, I'll probably try to write them in Python. > Then maybe he can port them to the C code for maximum portability. > (Yes, I could port them to C too, but I bet DV can do it about 10 > times faster :-)
Problem is that those extension functions need to return nodesets and I didn't yet finished that part in the Python bindings. I will try to get this in the next release. But since the final goal is to have them directly part of the C implementation getting the Java existing code for the couple of implementations you did already could allow to avoid a round-trip. Where are they ? What are the most critical extensions ? Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
