At 20:18 08/10/2002, David Cramer wrote: >XEP 2.7x, but these aren't floats. It's a block thing inside of a para, specifically >when there's mixed content before the block thing. > > <para> > The following image shows just what I mean. > <informalfigure float="0"> > <mediaobject> > <imageobject><imagedata fileref="../image.gif"/> > </imageobject> > </mediaobject> > </informalfigure> > Here's some more text about the image. > </para> > >When the renderer has a choice of putting the image with the text that comes before >the image (but is in the same para)or with text that comes after, it should go with >the text that comes before.
Yep, sounds reasonable. > If you have a figure, list, procedure, or whatever inside of a para, you're >indicating that the text in that para is closely related to the figure, list, or >procedure. Err no. That might be your or even my version. I've slowly learned that its rarely a universal. (mho) >Unfortunately, it's difficult to put together good test cases that show the behavior, >but in a document we're working with that has lots of screenshots we had lots of >pages where the image was pushed to the next page, while the text that introduced it >was on the previous page, sometimes with lots of blank space. Mmm/ Messy. A standard markup, then customisation, sounds about right for that. Then I'd recommend a 'keep-with-next' with high priority. Regards DaveP >Not sure if I'm expressing myself well, but it's intuitive when you see it :) I was surprised to see you drawing it 'side by side' which is float end style, hence my comment. REgards DaveP
