> / Norman Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > | Why is it a great problem? The result should be 90% of the paragraph > | size in the first case and 90% of the title size in the second. > > And on further inspection, it just looks awful. Setting the font size > on the basis of "em"s is just wrong. It really should be based on > relative "ex" heights and those aren't available. I think I'll abandon > the crude attempt to make monospaced fonts look a little more > aesthetically sized. >
font-size-adjust is just for this purpose, by the way. Assigning it a known value will make symbols from different fonts look similar in size. David
