> Ideally, I suppose, PassiveTeX needs to be able to interpret proportional > widths. I don't know what that entails, though. Would it be unreasonable to > ask that the next version of pagesetup.xsl set the column widths to 33 or > 34 % instead of proportional-column-width when the the > passivetex.extensions param is set to 1? Should I put in a RFC?
someone remind me what "proportional-columnwidth(1)" should mean? I can trap it, but not sure now to interpret it :-} the current situation is a bug. I can fix it quickly, but can you send me a test .fo file, Dennis, to make sure I do it right? Sebastian
