Am Dienstag, den 27.02.2007, 18:38 +0900 schrieb Michael(tm) Smith: > Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2007-02-27 08:59 +0100: > > > Yeah. This could have been a solution :) I just have one problem with > > that: The extensions do not exist on Debian systems. Unfortunately I > > cannot provide them with the docbook-xsl package. Maybe it could be a > > way to provide the extensions (and only the extensions, not the whole > > saxon.jar) as separate java archive (something like > > saxon-nwalsh-ext.jar). But I don't know, if this is possible or if the > > Saxon version in docbook-xsl's SVN is heavily patched. > > We don't actually have a Saxon version in our svn -- the only > thing we have are source files for the DocBook XSL Java > extensions, which is what the jar files in docbook-xsl are built > from. Users need to separately install Saxon (for example, Debian > users need to install libsaxon-java) in order to use Saxon.
Yes. I already noticed that. IMO that should ease the problem. > > I should ask our pkg-java team. They should probably know. > > If you can, please forward or Cc me on any correspondence you have > with them about the DocBook XSL Java extensions. Putting together > a upstream package of just the extensions separate from the > stylesheets should not be too much work, but I want to make sure > it'll meet whatever the Java packaging policy guidelines Debian > and other distros may have. The thread started here: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-java-maintainers/2007-February/010475.html and is probably continued in debian-java: http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2007/02/msg00039.html Regards, Daniel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
