Am Donnerstag, den 22.03.2007, 16:30 +0900 schrieb Michael(tm) Smith: > Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2007-03-20 00:31 +0100: > > > If I use e.g. > > > > <xsl:template match="literal"> > > <xsl:text>\fB</xsl:text> > > <xsl:apply-templates/> > > <xsl:text>\fR</xsl:text> > > </xsl:template> > > Better to use the following: > > <xsl:template match="literal"> > <xsl:if test="$man.hyphenate.computer.inlines = 0"> > <xsl:call-template name="suppress.hyphenation"/> > </xsl:if> > <xsl:apply-templates mode="bold" select="."/> > </xsl:template> > > If you look at the manpages source (for example, the > manpages/inline.xsl file), you’ll notice that’s the way boldfacing > of similar elements is handled.
Thanks for the hint, but I already found that. The cited code is from another project, which had broken manpages now. I already suggested your code to avoid the broken manpage output ;) I was just wondering, why the using this worked, but using <xsl:text>\fB</xsl:text> did not. I just oversaw, that you used the unicode code to represent the backslash in the mode="bold" template, which explains the difference. Regards, Daniel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
