Dave Pawson wrote:
Nicolas RAINARD wrote:
Several years ago, you were talking about getting "Simpler XHTML
output" (initiating thread can be found at
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/docbook-apps/2005-q2/msg00230.html).
The whole discussion broached in accessibility and CSS layout,
instead of tables layout.
Bob may correct me, but AFAIK docbook doesn't use table based layout
and any CSS additions are the authors, not a part of the standard
docbook formatting, though provision is made for CSS usage.
I don't know how it goes for general layout, but I am absolutely sure a
table layout is used for QandAset (what I wanted for my first DocBook).
This is why I spent a whole day to search how I could resolve this. I
used the 5.0 XSLT and it seems it processes pretty much as the 4.x do. I
had a glimpse in the XSLT2 snapshot, and I didn't find a XHTML output in
this release. Maybe is it still automatically generated from the HTML
one? I am not sure it is the best way, for transitional HTML and strict
XHTML have few things in common.
Moreover, the QandAset is rendered with definition lists (<dl></dl>)
instead of ordered lists (<ol></ol>), which makes me puzzled...
It seems you started a new project: to make a brand new forked XHTML
XSL.
What is the current step of this project? Is it still undergoing or
as it been abandoned? For many reasons, I am very interested in
getting semantical, CSS styled XHTML output.
So are many of us, which is why we choose docbook!
Maybe am I wrong and then, could you tell me how I can get a "pure",
table-less output?
Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
