Hi, Am Sonntag, den 24.06.2007, 18:45 +0900 schrieb Michael(tm) Smith: > Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2007-06-22 17:21 +0200: > > [...] > > I maybe missed other things. So can somebody determine, if these are > > issues in fop or in docbook-xsl? > > The way to isolate whether it's a problem in fop or in docbook-xsl > is to run the same document through a conformant XSL-FO engine > such as RenderX xep or DiType and check if you see the same > problem. If you don't, it's a bug or limitation in FOP.
Thanks for the hint. > If you don't have access to xep or DiType or another conformant > XSL-FO engine, you can ask on this list or on #docbook to run the > same document through xep or DiType or whatever for you and then > send/post the result to you. I will do next time :) This time, I found the issue. It was a configuration issue: procedure.properties used formal.object.properties, which used keep-together.within-column=always and trying to change this via dbfo did not work. I now simply changed the keep-together.within-column to auto globally for processing this article. Maybe the dbfo-variant of defining the keep-together.within-column value should probably work by default for more elements. Regards, Daniel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
