On Fri, Sep 21 2007 18:02:44 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > While it may seem like Saxon is validating, it actually is not validating your > elements against the DTD. All XML parsers must *read* the DTD to find
Strictly speaking, an XML processor does not have to read an external DTD (i.e., an 'external subset') when the XML document has an XML declaration containing 'standalone="yes"' [1]. In practice, an XSLT processor will have a strong desire to read the external subset for the sake of the id() function (and, in XSLT 2.0, the idref() function). So much so that I haven't found a way to make Saxon not read the external subset even when I use 'standalone="yes"'. I would like to since I have a client who would like to use a DTD when editing but doesn't want to have to configure catalogs for when doing a transform on a different system. Regards, Tony Graham. ====================================================================== [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.menteithconsulting.com Menteith Consulting Ltd Registered in Ireland - No. 428599 Registered Office: 13 Kelly's Bay Beach, Skerries, Co. Dublin, Ireland ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Menteith Consulting -- Understanding how markup works ====================================================================== [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xml/#sec-rmd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
