Thomas Schraitle wrote:
If a.xml includes subdir/b.xml, the anchor node holding the b.xml
document inside the result set has to get xml:base="subdir/b.xml". It's
the xml processor (in this case, xslt processor) which has to do this.
Maybe I wasn't clear enough, but that was not my point. The *FO* shouldn't
get a xml:base, right? :)
For me, it looked like the original poster described a final FO file
containing a xml:base attribute (see above).
I only see two possibilities to deal with relative URLs: Either they get
explicitely adjusted by the fo generator, or they keep their original
value. In the latter case the xml:base attribute has to be preserved, or
the fo processor won't be able to locate the resources.
In the fo output I have looked at (generated with xsltproc /
docbook-xsl) the xml:base attribute is still present, albeit wrong in
certain cases.
Regards,
Stefan
--
...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
