On Wed, Mar 12 2008 14:16:19 +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Norman Walsh wrote: >> / Tony Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: >> | On Wed, Mar 12 2008 12:18:29 +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> | ... >> |> Likewise, using pseudo-page numbers: >> |> >> |> F >> |> >> |> Foo, _1_, _2_ >> |> >> |> is misleading because readers have been conditioned to think of those as >> |> page numbers. A "1" under Foo should be the same place as a "1" under >> |> Bar which simply won't be the case. >> | >> | FWIW, I think that scheme works okay in the CSS2 index at >> | http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-CSS2/indexlist.html >> >> Bleh. I think it looks ridiculous. > > Me too? It seems to be trying to outguess the author?
I expect that the authors made the HTML. > A little bit M$ 'ish? > > Peurile perhaps, rather than ridiculous Tony? Maybe I've read the CSS spec so much that I'm starting to go blind, or at least got used to its way of presenting the index. I didn't say it was perfect, and it could probably do with having the section title as the title of each link, but I would still say that it works okay. Regards, Tony. ====================================================================== [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.menteithconsulting.com Menteith Consulting Ltd Registered in Ireland - No. 428599 Registered Office: 13 Kelly's Bay Beach, Skerries, Co. Dublin, Ireland ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Menteith Consulting -- Understanding how markup works ====================================================================== --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
