Florent Georges wrote:
If I am right, even with version="1.0", Saxon 9 should recognize xsl:result-document. But is it really Saxon 9? I would test it for real with something like:<xsl:template match="/"> <info> <version info="{ system-property('xsl:version') }"/> <vendor info="{ system-property('xsl:vendor') }"/> <vendor-url info="{ system-property('xsl:vendor-url') }"/> </info> </xsl:template> (maybe added in the original stylesheet, using xsl:comment to put this info in a comment in the original output, using exactly the same system to run the transform). JAXP is not always giving you the processor implementation you think it would ;-)
That would be a nice piece of debug information to add either way? Especially as docbook moves towards v5 and xslt 2.0 Very useful for this list at least! regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
