Thanks Justin.
I am assuming that you have specific stylesheets to handle the "MathML" role?
Regards,
Dean Nelson
In a message dated 10/20/08 23:45:34 Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Dean,
Here's a real-world example, copied (almost) straight from one of my
lectures:
<informalequation>
<mediaobject>
<textobject role="tex">
<phrase><![CDATA[
P(k \textrm{ heads in } n \textrm{ flips}) \;=\;
{n \choose k} p^k (1 - p)^{n-k}
]]></phrase>
</textobject>
<textobject role="MathML">
<xi:include href="texmath/1775461169.xml"/>
</textobject>
</mediaobject>
</informalequation>
I validate this "shallowly" through nxml-mode within emacs using my
own RelaxNG customization on top of docbook-rng-4.5/docbook.rnc which
essentially mixes in xinclude in strategic places, and includes
mathml2 in a way consistent (I think) with the official DocBook 4.5
MathML extension. For "deep" validation I use "xmllint --nonet --noout
--xinclude --postvalid ...".
Justus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:12:44 EDT:
> All,
> In my application, I need to do both PDF and HTML. I would like to do it
> similar to a mediaobject and use "role" to differentiate the processign path
> needed.
>
> <equation>
> <mediaobject>
> <imageobject role="html"> .....</imageobject>
> <textobject role="pdf"> **include the MML file *** </textobject>
> </mediaobject>
> </equation>
>
> Something like that. But what is the preferred way of including MathML in a
> mediaobject? Or is there a more sane manner in which to go about this task?
