Speaking as a guy who chewed through a lot of hours trying to get DiffMk operating at an acceptable level, just buy the DeltaXML license and figure out a way of scripting access to it.
DiffMk was an hobby/experiment for Norm. The DeltaXML people are specialists and have built a tonne of functionality into their products. In addition to that, they're a very nice bunch. Cheers, Jeff. -----Original Message----- From: Camille Bégnis [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 11:51 PM To: Marcel Tromp; apps docbook Subject: [docbook-apps] Re: [docbook] diffmk Hi, please look at this thread: http://markmail.org/message/u7fccvab3obvovul?q=docbook+diffmk+configuration&page=1&refer=ygqxnn6mvplvdcua Camille. Marcel Tromp wrote: > I am trying to use diffmk 3.0.a1 to generate change markup for > docbook5. It is kind of working, but I have certain changesets where > deleted text is put in a <phrase> at an illegal location as well as an > superfluous </section>: > > </section> > <phrase revisionflag="deleted">Some deleted Text.</phrase> > </section> > > I also read diffmk needs a diffmk.xml config file, but I am not able > to have the tool pick it up. How is this done? Is this file still > relevant for version 3.0.a1 (it is not part of the distribution)? > > Or should I just switch to DeltaXML? Their licensing model is a bit > painful (cpu core based instead of number of concurrent users) and > will pretty much prevent us from local docbook processing. > > Thanks, > > Marcel > -- > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
