On Fri, Feb 20 2009 16:14:10 +0000, [email protected] wrote: ... > I think this has to be an incremental process, as even *some* testing > is better than no testing. In particular, I can see different steps: ... > 3) validate against document types, if applicable (xmllint with > validation, etc.)
RenderX has multiple XSL-FO validators at http://www.renderx.com/tools/validators.html > 4) validate final output by visually inspecting it. To cut down the eyeballing of FO output: rasterize the pages, diff the results of successive runs, only rerasterize the tests that have differences, and have a way to highlight differences between two rasters (e.g., 'stereo' view). Regards, Tony Graham [email protected] Director W3C XSL FO SG Invited Expert Menteith Consulting Ltd XML, XSL and XSLT consulting, programming and training Registered Office: 13 Kelly's Bay Beach, Skerries, Co. Dublin, Ireland Registered in Ireland - No. 428599 http://www.menteithconsulting.com -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- xmlroff XSL Formatter http://xmlroff.org xslide Emacs mode http://www.menteith.com/wiki/xslide Unicode: A Primer urn:isbn:0-7645-4625-2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
