Eric Johnson wrote:
One of the big hurdles for advocating the use of DocBook in “public” open source projects is that there are plenty of wiki based alternatives that are free, have short learning curves, and do not require “building”.
True. There are always easier alternatives. These still require project effort to generate the documentation though? That, I think, was the focus of Karens message.
Developers can easily contribute to the pool of documentation. The wiki approach does have some drawbacks
Yes, of course. Most alternatives have some pro's and con's. As Karen notes, documentation, in docbook, for docbook .... is weird anyway :-) regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
