Quoting Karen Schneider <[email protected]>:
In terms of workflow, assuming there is one person reviewing the XML and processing it into HTML, I'm wondering: what gets checked in? The HTML... or the XML, and the HTML?
You'd check in the XML, as the HTML can always be re-generated from the XML sources.
Also, in terms of documenting the transformation process, is there a convention for noting in the code what XSL processor was used (and what switches, if any)?
The simplest approach is to use a transformation script, or, better yet, a Makefile, to run the transformation. Check that into svn as well, so you'll always know how your sources were processed at a particular revision of your svn repository.
just my 2cc Markus -- Markus Hoenicka [email protected] (Spam-protected email: replace the quadrupeds with "mhoenicka") http://www.mhoenicka.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
