Looks like the bug was fixed. I have also tried turning on fop1.extensions, but that didn't work either.
No draft watermark. I'm confused. 2009/6/26 Paul Suckling <[email protected]>: > Ahh. I think I have found the answer myself in this thread. > http://sourceware.org/ml/docbook-apps/2003-q3/msg00192.html > > Looks like a bug (from 2003?) that hasn't been fixed yet. I'll investigate. > > 2009/6/26 Paul Suckling <[email protected]>: >> Yes. That fixed it. Thanks. >> >> I think the DocBook documentation could be improved in this respect. >> The documentation for remark does not make any reference to this >> parameter. My expectation from the documentation was that it remarks >> would be suppressed automatically when draft.mode was set to 'no'. I >> think this would be good default behaviour. >> >> I've got another related problem to deal with now. I have set the >> draft.watermark.image parameter to point to a local .png file. When >> draft.mode is set to 'yes' I see lots of >> >> background-image="url(file:///C:/<snip>/draft.png)" >> >> attributes in my .fo output. However, I can't see the image in my PDF >> output. Anyone got an idea what might be going wrong here? >> >> Thank you. >> >> 2009/6/26 David Cramer <[email protected]>: >>> <remark>s are controlled by a separate parameter: >>> http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/doc/html/show.comment >>> s.html >>> >>> David >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Paul Suckling [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 6:08 AM >>>> To: DocBook Apps >>>> Subject: [docbook-apps] Problems with draft.mode >>>> >>>> I am having some problems using draft.mode. I have a document >>>> with some <remark>...</remark> elements in it. I have checked >>>> that my customisation layer doesn't contain any occurrences >>>> of draft.mode or remark... so any customisations being >>>> applied shouldn't be interfering with the default behaviour. >>>> I have grabbed the latest snapshots of the DocBook stylesheets. >>>> >>>> I am converting the document to pdf via fo and using apache >>>> FOP version 0.95. I am creating two versions. A draft version with: >>>> >>>> xsltproc --xinclude --stringparam draft.mode yes --output >>>> UG.xml.draft.fo >>>> /usr/share/docbook-xsl-latest/customisation/fo/custom.xsl >>>> UG.xml fop.bat -d -fo UG.xml.draft.fo -pdf UG.xml.draft.pdf >>>> >>>> and a final version with >>>> >>>> xsltproc --xinclude --stringparam draft.mode no --output >>>> UG.xml.fo >>>> /usr/share/docbook-xsl-latest/customisation/fo/custom.xsl >>>> UG.xml fop.bat -d -fo UG.xml.fo -pdf UG.xml.pdf >>>> >>>> The problem is that the remarks are appearing in the final >>>> version as well as the draft version, but I thought that with >>>> draft.mode="no" >>>> they weren't supposed to appear. >>>> >>>> Anyone got any ideas about what might be going wrong? >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Nashi Power. >> http://nashi.podzone.org/ >> Registered address: 7 Trescoe Gardens, Harrow, Middx., U.K. >> > > > > -- > Nashi Power. > http://nashi.podzone.org/ > Registered address: 7 Trescoe Gardens, Harrow, Middx., U.K. > -- Nashi Power. http://nashi.podzone.org/ Registered address: 7 Trescoe Gardens, Harrow, Middx., U.K. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
