On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Bob Stayton<[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Karen, > Yes, the example you provided is correct.
It's really just the one in your book, rephrased so that I'm absolutely sure what I'm doing. Which helped! > > I'm afraid there is some ambiguity in the use of "document", especially when > you divide your content into modular files. An XML file containing a single > <chapter> element is an XML document, and so is an XML file containing a > <book> element that XIncludes one or more of those chapter documents. And > outside of XML, "document" typically refers to a published unit. Yes, I can see the ambiguity (it appears to be widespread). I think I will address that in our glossary -- I have questions about that I'll gather and post. :-) > > I think you are calling the id attribute of the root element of each file > the "document id", but that isn't an official XML term. It just means the > id of the document's root element. Thanks, this clarification helps. -- -- | Karen G. Schneider | Community Librarian | Equinox Software Inc. "The Evergreen Experts" | Toll-free: 1.877.Open.ILS (1.877.673.6457) x712 | [email protected] | Web: http://www.esilibrary.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
