(reposting to group)
 
Hmm, is there any way around this other than globally disabling that  
feature? Maybe if I added another tiny row to the table so it can have a bottom 
 
line (which is kind of cheesy) or is there a better way? I really need this  
type of capability - but just on one really weird table.
 
Dean
 

 
 
In a message dated 9/11/2009 9:27:11 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:

Hi Dean,
You said "wouldn't it make sense to allow a  "rowsep" on a cell when the 
table has a frame="none" ?"
 
It does make sense, but DocBook tries to adhere  as closely as possible to 
the CALS table standard, and that would require a  change to the standard, 
which explicitly says the rowsep on the last row is to  be ignored.
 
Bob Stayton
Sagehill Enterprises
[email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) 
 
 

----- Original Message ----- 
From:  _DeanNelson_ (mailto:[email protected])  
To: _Bob Stayton_ (mailto:[email protected])  ; 
[email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])  
 
Sent: Monday, September 07, 2009 7:52  PM
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Table Line  Thickness


Great - Thanks Bob.
 
This all came about when I needed to render a  table in PDF that had no 
borders, but had one cell on the bottom  of the table that needed a bottom 
line, but I could not render it because  the "rowsep" does not work on the 
bottom cell because the outer table line  would overwrite it.
 
Sooo... I decided to try to render that  particular table a bit different, 
hence the question. But since I got you on  the line, wouldn't it make sense 
to allow a "rowsep" on a cell when the  table has a frame="none" ?
 
Thanks,
Dean Nelson
 
 
 
In a message dated 09/05/09 16:26:20 Pacific Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:

      
Hi Dean,
You could do it with a processing instruction, a tabstyle attribute  is 
more appropriate. A tabstyle can be put on a table or  informaltable element to 
indicate to the stylesheet that  different styling is required.  
 
If you go with tabstyle, you can call a utility template named  'tabstyle' 
that  returns the value of the attribute for the current  table.  The 
tabstyle template is described here:
 
 
_http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/PrintTableStyles.html#TabstyleTemplate_ 
(http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/PrintTableStyles.html#TabstyleTemplate) 
 

To customize the frame borders, you would copy and edit the template  named 
table.frame in fo/table.xsl to use an xsl:choose statement to select  the 
frame thickness.  An example of using xsl:choose with  tabstyle for table 
cell properties is shown here:
 
_http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/PrintTableStyles.html#CustomCellProperti
es_ 
(http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/PrintTableStyles.html#CustomCellProperties) 
 
In the table.frame template, you could do that once at the top of the  
template to fill a variable, and then use that variable in place of  
$table.frame.border.thickness in the long set of frame choices that  follow:
 
  <xsl:variable name="tabstyle">
<xsl:call-template name="tabstyle"/>
</xsl:variable>
 
  <xsl:variable  name="frame.thickness">
<xsl:choose>
<xsl:when  test="$tabstyle='thickborder'">2pt</xsl:when>
<xsl:when  test="$tabstyle='verythickborder'">4pt</xsl:when>
<xsl:otherwise>
<xsl:value-of  select="$table.frame.border.thickness"/>
</xsl:otherwise>
</xsl:choose>
</xsl:variable>
 
And then replace all other instances in the template of  
$table.frame.border.thickness with $frame.thickness.
 
If you need to also change the rowsep and colsep (cell borders), then  
customize the template named 'border' in fo/table.xsl with the same  technique.
 
Bob Stayton
Sagehill Enterprises
[email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) 
 
 

----- Original Message ----- 
From:  [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])  
To: [email protected]_ 
(mailto:[email protected])   
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009  5:34 PM
Subject: [docbook-apps] Table Line  Thickness


Hello everyone,
 
Is there a way to control the thickness of the border of each table  
separately? The common parameter only applies to ALL tables.
 
Maybe an additional PI?
 
Thanks
Dean Nelson

 
____________________________________








Reply via email to